1 |
On Wed, 2006-01-11 at 05:00 -1000, Beau E. Cox wrote: |
2 |
|
3 |
> Sorry I didn't make that clearer - the results below were generated |
4 |
> _completely_ outside of portage; for each test I manually unpacked, |
5 |
> perl Makefile.pl, make, make test in the traditional way. The only |
6 |
> thing I can see that was different was the perl I used (same make, same |
7 |
> version of Extutils::Command, etc. ). |
8 |
> |
9 |
But in the tests results you pasted (or at least what I read) the tests |
10 |
failed in the same ways, the only discernable difference being from |
11 |
different versions of Test::(more? simple? same package, you know what I |
12 |
mean :) |
13 |
|
14 |
> I guess I will proceed to get into big trouble by building a perl in |
15 |
> portage (overriding the standard) with the configuration I used in |
16 |
> my /home/beau perl. If my system is still running :) I'll get back to |
17 |
> you soon. |
18 |
> |
19 |
I'd be curious to see where the deliminating factor is that could result |
20 |
in different return codes on dies...that's just plain lala :) |
21 |
|
22 |
> PS: Sorry about posting the patch on the list - will bugzilla from now on. |
23 |
> |
24 |
Bah, if i didn't give the disclaimer, i'd regret it later. now i have it |
25 |
in writing somewhere ;) |
26 |
> -- |
27 |
> Aloha => Beau; |
28 |
> |
29 |
~mcummings |