1 |
The "Feature Availability by EAPI" table looks nasty. Once we add EAPI |
2 |
5 in there, it won't properly fit on the page. Here are some ideas: |
3 |
|
4 |
Left align the 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 column headers. |
5 |
|
6 |
For "default_ phase functions" and "econf arguments", there's too much |
7 |
column text. We could either replace this with "see text", or put a |
8 |
quick summary into a different table and say "see table D.2". |
9 |
|
10 |
We could nuke the first column. |
11 |
|
12 |
We could put in some "light" lines on the table. Then for features that |
13 |
are shared across EAPIs, we can do this: |
14 |
|
15 |
| 0 1 | 2 3 | 4 5 | |
16 |
+----------------------+------------+--------------+-------------+ |
17 |
|Use Dependencies | No | 2-style | 4-style | |
18 |
+----------------------+----+-------+--------------+-------------+ |
19 |
|src_compile | 0 | 1 | 2 | |
20 |
|
21 |
possibly with multi-column text centred. |
22 |
|
23 |
Or we could do it using some kind of background shading on cells |
24 |
instead? |
25 |
|
26 |
-- |
27 |
Ciaran McCreesh |