1 |
On 04/30/2012 03:14 PM, Andreas K. Huettel wrote: |
2 |
> Am Freitag 27 April 2012, 22:12:27 schrieb Ciaran McCreesh: |
3 |
>> On Fri, 27 Apr 2012 21:58:24 +0200 |
4 |
>> |
5 |
>> Michał Górny <mgorny@g.o> wrote: |
6 |
>>> Of course, if we take the 'quick EAPI 5 route', it won't include |
7 |
>>> anything useful. In the meantime, do we have a complete list of |
8 |
>>> candidates for EAPI 5? |
9 |
>> |
10 |
>> Let's continue this on the PMS list. |
11 |
>> |
12 |
> [...] |
13 |
> |
14 |
> Pretty please, |
15 |
> |
16 |
> * package.use.stable.mask and package.use.stable.force support, as discussed |
17 |
> on gentoo-dev (there and on IRC feedback was pretty much positive) |
18 |
> |
19 |
> http://archives.gentoo.org/gentoo-dev/msg_6c492ae43ad7c70cef6aa8ac34911adf.xml |
20 |
|
21 |
We'd probably also want to add a use.stable file, in order to control |
22 |
default USE settings for stable users. This could come in handy for |
23 |
creating default PYTHON_TARGETS settings that correspond to the users's |
24 |
latest visible slots of python, as discussed here: |
25 |
|
26 |
https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=415575#c5 |
27 |
-- |
28 |
Thanks, |
29 |
Zac |