Gentoo Archives: gentoo-pms

From: Ciaran McCreesh <ciaran.mccreesh@××××××××××.com>
To: gentoo-pms@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-pms] [PATCH 15/22] EAPI 6 has in_iuse.
Date: Thu, 15 Oct 2015 16:56:45
Message-Id: 20151015175637.071ab02b@googlemail.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-pms] [PATCH 15/22] EAPI 6 has in_iuse. by Ulrich Mueller
1 On Thu, 15 Oct 2015 18:49:37 +0200
2 Ulrich Mueller <ulm@g.o> wrote:
3 > >>>>> On Thu, 15 Oct 2015, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
4 > > On Thu, 15 Oct 2015 12:50:14 +0200
5 > > Ulrich Müller <ulm@g.o> wrote:
6 > >> Bug: 449862
7 >
8 > > This should explicitly require the package mangler to die if it's
9 > > used from a global scope context, to catch all the likely screwups.
10 >
11 > We already say in the first paragraph of the section: "Ebuilds must
12 > not run any of these functions in global scope." which applies to all
13 > USE list functions.
14
15 How about taking the opportunity to explicitly force all of these to
16 die, then? I can see in_iuse being abused horribly if Portage isn't
17 made to enforce this...
18
19 --
20 Ciaran McCreesh

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-pms] [PATCH 15/22] EAPI 6 has in_iuse. Ulrich Mueller <ulm@g.o>
Re: [gentoo-pms] [PATCH 15/22] EAPI 6 has in_iuse. "Michał Górny" <mgorny@g.o>