| 1 |
On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 05:54:51PM +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: |
| 2 |
> This takes us back to the Council-approved syntax, as opposed to the |
| 3 |
> change introduced with sub-slots. |
| 4 |
> --- |
| 5 |
> dependencies.tex | 2 +- |
| 6 |
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) |
| 7 |
> |
| 8 |
> diff --git a/dependencies.tex b/dependencies.tex |
| 9 |
> index 47c0261..8c3f31d 100644 |
| 10 |
> --- a/dependencies.tex |
| 11 |
> +++ b/dependencies.tex |
| 12 |
> @@ -301,7 +301,7 @@ identically to the plain equals slot operator. |
| 13 |
> To implement the equals slot operator, the package manager will need to store the slot/sub-slot |
| 14 |
> pair of the best installed version of the matching package. This syntax is only for package manager |
| 15 |
> use and must not be used by ebuilds. The package manager may do this by inserting the appropriate |
| 16 |
> -slot/sub-slot pair between the colon and equals sign when saving the package's dependencies. The |
| 17 |
> +slot/sub-slot pair after the equals sign when saving the package's dependencies. The |
| 18 |
> sub-slot part must not be omitted here (when the SLOT variable omits the sub-slot part, the package |
| 19 |
> is considered to have an implicit sub-slot which is equal to the regular slot). |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
Yes please; :3= I thought bug-fricking-ugly. |
| 22 |
~harring |
Archives