| 1 |
>>>>> On Wed, 16 Sep 2009, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
> As previously discussed, |
| 4 |
|
| 5 |
Where did such a discussion take place? I'm not aware of any. (Or do |
| 6 |
you mean the one back in April, buried in the tread "Patches for your |
| 7 |
reviewing pleasure"? Its outcome was different.) |
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
> I've created a Github repo which you can find at: |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
> http://github.com/ciaranm/pms |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
You shouldn't take such hasty and single-handed decisions. That you |
| 14 |
got your bugzilla access suspended has nothing to do with the PMS |
| 15 |
project. |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
The question is really what we want PMS to be. If it should be the |
| 18 |
authoritative document describing package manager behaviour and repo |
| 19 |
layout, then there's no alternative to hosting on Gentoo infra. If you |
| 20 |
want it to decline to a "man page" (read the log of the last council |
| 21 |
meeting), then go ahead and move it to Github. |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
So please reconsider. |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
> Any volunteers to update the project page and ebuilds? I'll ask |
| 26 |
> infra to remove the hosting on overlays.g.o once those're done to |
| 27 |
> avoid confusion. |
| 28 |
|
| 29 |
If such a thing took place, it would be enough reason for me to resign |
| 30 |
from the PMS project. |
| 31 |
|
| 32 |
Ulrich |
Archives