1 |
On Saturday 19 September 2009 22:25:41 Ciaran McCreesh wrote: |
2 |
> On Sat, 19 Sep 2009 22:15:40 +0200 |
3 |
> |
4 |
> Patrick Lauer <patrick@g.o> wrote: |
5 |
> > Three small edits. |
6 |
> > |
7 |
> > - Removing a sentence that has no content, but spans three lines |
8 |
> |
9 |
> No, the two sentences you're removing both have meaning: |
10 |
> |
11 |
> The first says that it's ok for things to exist in profiles/categories |
12 |
> that don't have a directory |
13 |
Rationale for that? |
14 |
|
15 |
> The second says that the package manager mustn't treat empty categories |
16 |
> and categories that don't exist differently. |
17 |
Not quite. What it says is that an empty and a non-existing category are |
18 |
equivalent, which doesn't explain how to treat them. Your current |
19 |
interpretation is already a large improvement. |
20 |
|
21 |
> Both are necessary. |
22 |
No, first one is confusing to read, second one is a tautology. |
23 |
|
24 |
> > - Simplifying the ebuild naming - since suffix is always "ebuild" |
25 |
> > there is no need to use an indirection |
26 |
> > |
27 |
> > - Fixing the list because "suffix is ebuild" now is redundant |
28 |
> |
29 |
> Uhm. That part of the patch doesn't apply, and the revision against |
30 |
> which you're basing it isn't in the repository. Where did you get |
31 |
> 'b78fde2' from? |
32 |
> |
33 |
Oh. I have over 900 lines diff already. Just pulling out the obvious changes |
34 |
before moving on to the more subjective and debatable ones. |