From: | Ulrich Mueller <ulm@g.o> |
---|---|
To: | "Petteri Räty" <betelgeuse@g.o> |
Cc: | gentoo-pms@l.g.o |
Subject: | [gentoo-pms] Re: Remove IMAGE retroactively? |
Date: | Tue, 28 Aug 2012 08:57:32 |
Message-Id: | 20540.34795.364474.105459@a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de |
1 | >>>>> On Tue, 28 Aug 2012, Petteri Räty wrote: |
2 | |
3 | > On 28.8.2012 11.18, Brian Harring wrote: |
4 | >> On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 9:31 PM, Ulrich Mueller <ulm@g.o> wrote: |
5 | >>> Portage doesn't export the IMAGE variable any more since several |
6 | >>> years. So it may be more appropriate to remove it from the spec |
7 | >>> entirely, instead of listing it as removed in EAPI 5. |
8 | >> |
9 | >> Are you positive portage hasn't exported this for a long while? I |
10 | >> recall trying to get IMAGE punted a while back and hitting a wall |
11 | >> since it was still there. |
12 | >> |
13 | >> Either way, kill the sucker. :) |
14 | |
15 | > Why does Portage remove such things without EAPI changes? |
16 | |
17 | I don't know. But it was removed in 2007 already, see bug 170671 |
18 | <https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=170671> and this commit: |
19 | <http://git.overlays.gentoo.org/gitweb/?p=proj/pms.git;a=commit;h=6be7d0168348e49cd4f8c8508a07ea3cb1d76a68> |
20 | |
21 | Later it was (accidentally?) readded to PMS in this commit: |
22 | <http://git.overlays.gentoo.org/gitweb/?p=proj/pms.git;a=commit;h=58d3bc0e830156d9b04830ac90a646f272e234af> |
23 | |
24 | Ulrich |
Subject | Author |
---|---|
[gentoo-pms] Re: Remove IMAGE retroactively? | Ulrich Mueller <ulm@g.o> |