From: | Zac Medico <zmedico@g.o> | ||
---|---|---|---|
To: | gentoo-pms@l.g.o | ||
Subject: | Re: [gentoo-pms] EAPI 5: does doheader have a -r option, or is recursion implied? | ||
Date: | Sat, 15 Sep 2012 21:05:29 | ||
Message-Id: | 5054ED84.1070504@gentoo.org | ||
In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-pms] EAPI 5: does doheader have a -r option, or is recursion implied? by Ulrich Mueller |
1 | On 09/15/2012 02:03 PM, Ulrich Mueller wrote: |
2 | > From e6ed3676bea254675b372645d5fc8f01d1e18eb4 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 |
3 | > From: =?UTF-8?q?Ulrich=20M=C3=BCller?= <ulm@g.o> |
4 | > Date: Sat, 15 Sep 2012 22:56:15 +0200 |
5 | > Subject: [PATCH] doheader accepts -r option for recursion. |
6 | |
7 | Looks good to me. |
8 | -- |
9 | Thanks, |
10 | Zac |
Subject | Author |
---|---|
Re: [gentoo-pms] EAPI 5: does doheader have a -r option, or is recursion implied? | Ulrich Mueller <ulm@g.o> |