1 |
On Wed, Dec 29, 2010 at 09:23:26AM +0100, Ulrich Mueller wrote: |
2 |
> >>>>> On Tue, 28 Dec 2010, Ulrich Mueller wrote: |
3 |
> |
4 |
> > So unless there are any last-minute changes (Fauli?), the following |
5 |
> > commit should be tagged: |
6 |
> |
7 |
> There's another trivial update (removal of an unused file, output is |
8 |
> not affected), so the commit to be tagged is: |
9 |
> <http://git.overlays.gentoo.org/gitweb/?p=proj/pms.git;a=commit;h=348ea6c695bf7fe079c43e294ddbd06bca3d0cfc> |
10 |
|
11 |
+1 on 348ea6c695bf7fe079c43e294ddbd06bca3d0cfc as the tagging point. |
12 |
|
13 |
> > The tag should be called "eapi-4-approved-2010-12-30" if we follow the |
14 |
> > convention we used for EAPIs 2 and 3. |
15 |
|
16 |
I'm personally of the opinion that should just be "eapi-4"; the commit |
17 |
msg can include the approval specifics. |
18 |
|
19 |
If we need to approve a tweaked version of eapi4 itself- just name it |
20 |
"eapi-4-v1" or whatever. Jamming the approval date in is annoying |
21 |
however. |
22 |
~brian |