| 1 |
On Sat, 21 Jun 2014 22:05:29 +0200 |
| 2 |
Ulrich Mueller <ulm@g.o> wrote: |
| 3 |
> >>>>> On Sat, 21 Jun 2014, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: |
| 4 |
> >> - Omit the oldest EAPIs (e.g., 0 and 1) from the table, and add a |
| 5 |
> >> reference to a previous version of the document. |
| 6 |
> |
| 7 |
> > Variation: consolidate EAPIs < 3 (say) into a single entry. |
| 8 |
> |
| 9 |
> Heh, do I see a numerical relation for EAPI there? :) |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
Temporal! |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
> What exactly to you mean by "consolidate"? List the values for EAPIs |
| 14 |
> 0, 1, and 2 in one table cell, in case they are different? On first |
| 15 |
> glance, it would be a bit unwieldy for some of the features with long |
| 16 |
> entries (e.g., default-phase-funcs). |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
Just to indicate that "something changed between these EAPIs, and if |
| 19 |
you're not a package mangler author, you should just use a later EAPI". |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
-- |
| 22 |
Ciaran McCreesh |
Archives