| 1 |
>> It's certainly possible to update. Right now, since package names |
| 2 |
>> can't include dots, any normal version syntax is pretty much banned |
| 3 |
>> anyway. Probably the only thing that would be accepted is a whole |
| 4 |
>> integer based version, with no ".x.x" subversioning present. |
| 5 |
> |
| 6 |
> You're forgetting letters and suffixes. It's not "pretty much" and |
| 7 |
> "probably" at all. |
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
I did consider those. |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
Since they have to be prefixed, they are only relevant in the same |
| 12 |
subset of cases, ie. single digit version numbers = rarely. |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
- Walter |
Archives