1 |
>>>>> On Sun, 18 Oct 2015, Michał Górny wrote: |
2 |
|
3 |
> On Sun, 18 Oct 2015 11:54:40 +0200 |
4 |
> Ulrich Mueller <ulm@g.o> wrote: |
5 |
|
6 |
>> So the question is if we should add a sentence like the following to |
7 |
>> the spec: |
8 |
>> |
9 |
>> In EAPIs where it is supported, all ebuilds must run |
10 |
>> \t{eapply\_user} in the \t{src\_prepare} phase. |
11 |
|
12 |
> How about: |
13 |
|
14 |
> In EAPIs listed in table blah blah blah, \t{eapply\_user} must |
15 |
> be called exactly once in the \t{src\_prepare} phase. |
16 |
|
17 |
> Which emphasizes that eclass or default may do it instead of ebuild. |
18 |
|
19 |
Yeah, that's better actually. We need not reference the table again |
20 |
though, since we do it in the sentence before. |
21 |
|
22 |
In EAPIs where it is supported, \t{eapply\_user} must be called |
23 |
exactly once in the \t{src\_prepare} phase. |
24 |
|
25 |
Ulrich |