Gentoo Archives: gentoo-pms

From: Ulrich Mueller <ulm@g.o>
To: "Michał Górny" <mgorny@g.o>
Cc: gentoo-dev@l.g.o, gentoo-pms@l.g.o
Subject: [gentoo-pms] Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-dev-announce] EAPI 6 draft for review
Date: Sun, 18 Oct 2015 10:18:12
Message-Id: 22051.29142.931683.738922@a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de
In Reply to: [gentoo-pms] Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-dev-announce] EAPI 6 draft for review by "Michał Górny"
1 >>>>> On Sun, 18 Oct 2015, Michał Górny wrote:
2
3 > On Sun, 18 Oct 2015 11:54:40 +0200
4 > Ulrich Mueller <ulm@g.o> wrote:
5
6 >> So the question is if we should add a sentence like the following to
7 >> the spec:
8 >>
9 >> In EAPIs where it is supported, all ebuilds must run
10 >> \t{eapply\_user} in the \t{src\_prepare} phase.
11
12 > How about:
13
14 > In EAPIs listed in table blah blah blah, \t{eapply\_user} must
15 > be called exactly once in the \t{src\_prepare} phase.
16
17 > Which emphasizes that eclass or default may do it instead of ebuild.
18
19 Yeah, that's better actually. We need not reference the table again
20 though, since we do it in the sentence before.
21
22 In EAPIs where it is supported, \t{eapply\_user} must be called
23 exactly once in the \t{src\_prepare} phase.
24
25 Ulrich