Archives
Archives
| From: | Ciaran McCreesh <ciaran.mccreesh@××××××××××.com> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-pms@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-pms] IUSE_EFFECTIVE and IUSE_REFERENCEABLE | ||
| Date: | Wed, 18 Jun 2014 18:20:14 | ||
| Message-Id: | 20140618192007.4d6a2bb9@googlemail.com | ||
| In Reply to: | [gentoo-pms] IUSE_EFFECTIVE and IUSE_REFERENCEABLE by Ulrich Mueller |
||
| 1 | On Wed, 18 Jun 2014 17:10:37 +0200 |
| 2 | Ulrich Mueller <ulm@g.o> wrote: |
| 3 | > Must the spec be corrected, such that it says that IUSE_REFERENCEABLE |
| 4 | > is equal to IUSE_EFFECTIVE, for all EAPIs? |
| 5 | |
| 6 | The spec is correct, and discusses what you can actually rely upon |
| 7 | working. It is unfortunate that the Council introduced this confusion |
| 8 | by approving "what Portage has implemented" for EAPI 4, without |
| 9 | considering the implications of approving (+) and (-) without the |
| 10 | stricter USE rules. |
| 11 | |
| 12 | -- |
| 13 | Ciaran McCreesh |
| File name | MIME type |
|---|---|
| signature.asc | application/pgp-signature |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-pms] IUSE_EFFECTIVE and IUSE_REFERENCEABLE | Ulrich Mueller <ulm@g.o> |