Gentoo Archives: gentoo-pms

From: Ciaran McCreesh <ciaran.mccreesh@××××××××××.com>
To: "Michał Górny" <mgorny@g.o>
Cc: gentoo-pms@l.g.o, Zac Medico <zmedico@g.o>, Ulrich Mueller <ulm@g.o>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-pms] Rephrasing *DEPEND
Date: Sun, 19 Jun 2011 21:38:38
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-pms] Rephrasing *DEPEND by "Michał Górny"
On Sun, 19 Jun 2011 23:21:02 +0200
Michał Górny <mgorny@g.o> wrote:
> And the third version. > > I added a note about the possible circular RDEPEND issue. I wanted to > do that through a footnote but wasn't able to get it working so it's > a standard bracket now).
I still don't think we should be specifying "RDEPEND is PDEPEND if the package manager feels like it". That's something for the package mangler to provide as a horrible --ignore-dependencies-to-break-cycles option. Also, isn't pkg_setup the same as pkg_preinst, availability-wise? -- Ciaran McCreesh


File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature


Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-pms] Rephrasing *DEPEND Ulrich Mueller <ulm@g.o>
Re: [gentoo-pms] Rephrasing *DEPEND "Michał Górny" <mgorny@g.o>