1 |
W dniu wto, 01.05.2018 o godzinie 13∶33 +0200, użytkownik Ulrich Mueller |
2 |
napisał: |
3 |
> > > > > > On Tue, 1 May 2018, Michał Górny wrote: |
4 |
> > Explain the format used by best_version command explicitly. Currently, |
5 |
> > the function only lists what gets printed but not in what form or how it |
6 |
> > is separated. |
7 |
> > --- |
8 |
> > pkg-mgr-commands.tex | 5 +++-- |
9 |
> > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) |
10 |
> > diff --git a/pkg-mgr-commands.tex b/pkg-mgr-commands.tex |
11 |
> > index cb704f0..4299624 100644 |
12 |
> > --- a/pkg-mgr-commands.tex |
13 |
> > +++ b/pkg-mgr-commands.tex |
14 |
> > @@ -105,8 +105,9 @@ are given, \t{-r} is assumed. |
15 |
> > \item[has_version] Takes exactly one package dependency specification as an argument. Returns |
16 |
> > true if a package matching the specification is installed, and false otherwise. |
17 |
> > \item[best_version] Takes exactly one package dependency specification as an argument. If a |
18 |
> > - matching package is installed, prints the category, package name and version of the highest |
19 |
> > - matching version; otherwise, prints an empty string. The exit code is unspecified. |
20 |
> > + matching package is installed, prints the category, followed by \t{/}, followed by package |
21 |
> > + name, followed by \t{-}, followed by full version of the highest matching version; |
22 |
> |
23 |
> Do we really need this? I think that "category, package name and |
24 |
> version" is pretty clear. |
25 |
> |
26 |
|
27 |
I don't think it's well-specified anywhere. The current wording would |
28 |
work as well with the format used by qatom: |
29 |
|
30 |
dev-python foo 2 |
31 |
|
32 |
|
33 |
-- |
34 |
Best regards, |
35 |
Michał Górny |