Archives
Archives
| From: | Ulrich Mueller <ulm@g.o> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | James Le Cuirot <chewi@g.o> | ||
| Cc: | gentoo-pms@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-pms] [PATCH] Correct the definition of ESYSROOT as EPREFIX isn't always applicable | ||
| Date: | Sun, 02 Jun 2019 12:28:15 | ||
| Message-Id: | w6g4l589nos.fsf@kph.uni-mainz.de | ||
| In Reply to: | [gentoo-pms] [PATCH] Correct the definition of ESYSROOT as EPREFIX isn't always applicable by James Le Cuirot |
||
| 1 | That's a fundamental change of the variable's definition, so presumably |
| 2 | it should be done in EAPI 8, not retroactively? |
| 3 | |
| 4 | Also (though not really relevant at this point yet): |
| 5 | |
| 6 | (./dependencies.tex |
| 7 | Chapter 8. |
| 8 | Overfull \hbox (282.82272pt too wide) in paragraph at lines 33--44 |
| 9 | |
| 10 | Ulrich |
| File name | MIME type |
|---|---|
| signature.asc | application/pgp-signature |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-pms] [PATCH] Correct the definition of ESYSROOT as EPREFIX isn't always applicable | James Le Cuirot <chewi@g.o> |
| Re: [gentoo-pms] [PATCH] Correct the definition of ESYSROOT as EPREFIX isn't always applicable | James Le Cuirot <chewi@g.o> |