1 |
On 01/09/2010 10:58 AM, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: |
2 |
> On Sat, 9 Jan 2010 09:18:19 +0100 |
3 |
> Ulrich Mueller <ulm@g.o> wrote: |
4 |
>>> Didn't the Council say that if it ever happened again, there should |
5 |
>>> be forced reverts rather than updating PMS retroactively? |
6 |
>> |
7 |
>> Yes, but any =bash-3.2* is still allowed: |
8 |
>> |
9 |
>> | Vote (6 yes, 1 no): Ebuilds must be completely parsable with |
10 |
>> | =bash-3.2*, any use of later bash features will be reverted. |
11 |
> |
12 |
> Doesn't the way that's worded mean "it has to work with every single |
13 |
> 3.2 patch", though? I take that to mean "must be completely parsable |
14 |
> with bash-3.2_p0 through bash-3.2_p9999", not "must work with at least |
15 |
> one version of bash-3.2_psomething". |
16 |
> |
17 |
|
18 |
At least my opinion is all instead of any. |
19 |
|
20 |
Regards, |
21 |
Petteri |