Gentoo Archives: gentoo-pms

From: "Petteri R├Ąty" <betelgeuse@g.o>
To: gentoo-pms@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-pms] Bash features
Date: Sat, 09 Jan 2010 16:12:47
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-pms] Bash features by Ciaran McCreesh
On 01/09/2010 10:58 AM, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> On Sat, 9 Jan 2010 09:18:19 +0100 > Ulrich Mueller <ulm@g.o> wrote: >>> Didn't the Council say that if it ever happened again, there should >>> be forced reverts rather than updating PMS retroactively? >> >> Yes, but any =bash-3.2* is still allowed: >> >> | Vote (6 yes, 1 no): Ebuilds must be completely parsable with >> | =bash-3.2*, any use of later bash features will be reverted. > > Doesn't the way that's worded mean "it has to work with every single > 3.2 patch", though? I take that to mean "must be completely parsable > with bash-3.2_p0 through bash-3.2_p9999", not "must work with at least > one version of bash-3.2_psomething". >
At least my opinion is all instead of any. Regards, Petteri


File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature