Gentoo Archives: gentoo-pms

From: "Michał Górny" <mgorny@g.o>
To: gentoo-pms@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-pms] [PATCH] Delete redundant sentence in at-most-one-of dependency.
Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2017 17:03:42
Message-Id: 1504112616.2590.0.camel@gentoo.org
In Reply to: [gentoo-pms] [PATCH] Delete redundant sentence in at-most-one-of dependency. by "Ulrich Müller"
1 W dniu śro, 30.08.2017 o godzinie 17∶51 +0200, użytkownik Ulrich Müller
2 napisał:
3 > An empty group will automatically fulfill the condition of "at most
4 > one immediate child element", therefore no special provision for an
5 > empty group is necessary here.
6 > ---
7 > dependencies.tex | 2 --
8 > 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)
9 >
10 > diff --git a/dependencies.tex b/dependencies.tex
11 > index d9a6f1a..21eeba5 100644
12 > --- a/dependencies.tex
13 > +++ b/dependencies.tex
14 > @@ -158,8 +158,6 @@ at-most-one-of group for match purposes.
15 >
16 > In an at-most-one-of group, at most one immediate child element must be matched.
17 >
18 > -An empty at-most-one-of group counts as being matched.
19 > -
20 > \subsection{Package dependency specifications}
21 >
22 > A package dependency can be in one of the following base formats. A package manager must warn or
23
24 I'd dare say keeping it would be more consistent with definitions for
25 other groups.
26
27 --
28 Best regards,
29 Michał Górny

Replies