1 |
>>>>> On Thu, 06 Apr 2017, Michał Górny wrote: |
2 |
|
3 |
> As I said on IRC, I've pointed this out as a curiosity but not a |
4 |
> bug. It actually fits well the table-oriented idea where different |
5 |
> features are associated with different EAPIs separately, rather than |
6 |
> saying 'in EAPI 4 and newer'. |
7 |
|
8 |
"eapply_user must be called once in the src_prepare phase for EAPIs |
9 |
supporting src_prepare, or in the src_unpack phase for EAPIs lacking |
10 |
src_prepare." |
11 |
|
12 |
IMHO we don't gain anything by specifying cases that cannot occur. |
13 |
It only makes the spec harder to read. |
14 |
|
15 |
(And no, you won't find above wording in PMS. :) |
16 |
|
17 |
Ulrich |