| 1 |
On Mon, Jun 07, 2010 at 08:26:47AM +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Sun, 6 Jun 2010 22:23:03 -0700 |
| 3 |
> Brian Harring <ferringb@×××××.com> wrote: |
| 4 |
> > Anyone know where '@' in use flags came from? Last I knew, the |
| 5 |
> > intention of '@' was to be used as a seperator/marker for use groups; |
| 6 |
> > it currently has zero users in gentoo-x86, thus I'm wondering |
| 7 |
> > where/why it was originally allowed. |
| 8 |
> |
| 9 |
> Linguas. |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
Fark. Knew I was forgetting to grep somewhere... |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
Follow up discussion point; anyone got a character to use for |
| 14 |
seperating use_expand groups and their members? I'm well aware '_' is |
| 15 |
used right now, but it's use is nonoptimal- the only way to break down |
| 16 |
a use_expanded target in IUSE is to know the use_expand grouppings |
| 17 |
themselves, which is profile defined... a flaw I've hated since day |
| 18 |
one. |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
~harring |
Archives