Gentoo Archives: gentoo-pms

From: David Leverton <levertond@××××××××××.com>
To: gentoo-pms@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-pms] [PATCH 1/2] Rewrite version comparison rules in pseudocode
Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2009 17:19:25
Message-Id: 200910191819.19454.levertond@googlemail.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-pms] [PATCH 1/2] Rewrite version comparison rules in pseudocode by Christian Faulhammer
1 On Sunday 18 October 2009 18:45:23 Christian Faulhammer wrote:
2 > Hi,
3 >
4 > I like the better readability of algorithmic presentation, but its
5 > wording is not entirely clear, but maybe I am wrong from solely
6 > patch reading. So those are algorithms for the comparison of
7 > components (separated by dots). For me it read on first try like a
8 > comparison of the whole version string, maybe an introducing sentence
9 > like the one you removed is suited:
10
11 Not quite sure what you mean by that... it is an algorithm for the whole
12 comparison, but it's broken up for readability.
13
14 > -Version specifications are compared component by component, moving
15 > from left to right.
16
17 Maybe "Version specifications are compared component by component, moving from
18 left to right, as detailed in Algorithm 1"?
19
20 > David Leverton <levertond@××××××××××.com>:
21 > > --- a/pms.cls
22 > > +++ b/pms.cls
23 > > @@ -100,7 +100,7 @@
24 > > % Enable the below option if you'd like to see both sides of KDEBUILD
25 > > % conditionals shown in different colours. Disable it to either fully
26 > > % enable or fully disable KDEBUILD. Not compatible with HTML output.
27 > > -\setboolean{ENABLE-ALL-OPTIONS}{false}
28 > > +\setboolean{ENABLE-ALL-OPTIONS}{true}
29 >
30 > Is this intended?
31
32 Oops.
33
34 > V-Li

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-pms] [PATCH 1/2] Rewrite version comparison rules in pseudocode Christian Faulhammer <fauli@g.o>