Gentoo Archives: gentoo-pms

From: Zac Medico <zmedico@g.o>
To: Ulrich Mueller <ulm@g.o>
Cc: "Michał Górny" <mgorny@g.o>, gentoo-pms@l.g.o, Ciaran McCreesh <ciaran.mccreesh@××××××××××.com>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-pms] Rephrasing *DEPEND
Date: Sun, 12 Jun 2011 10:07:15
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-pms] Rephrasing *DEPEND by Ulrich Mueller
1 On 06/12/2011 01:18 AM, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
2 >>>>>> On Sun, 12 Jun 2011, Micha³ Górny wrote:
3 >
4 >> True. How about pkg_setup()? Shall we assume RDEPEND are there or
5 >> rely on @system only?
6 >
7 > IIUC, with Portage's breaking of dependency cycles there's no absolute
8 > guarantee that packages in RDEPEND will be available in pkg_*.
10 It would be more accurate to say that it's guaranteed except for cases
11 in which circular dependencies make it impossible to guarantee.
12 --
13 Thanks,
14 Zac


Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-pms] Rephrasing *DEPEND "Michał Górny" <mgorny@g.o>
Re: [gentoo-pms] Rephrasing *DEPEND Brian Harring <ferringb@×××××.com>