1 |
Am Dienstag 01 Mai 2012, 10:38:41 schrieb Ciaran McCreesh: |
2 |
|
3 |
> > Well. PMS describes the files in a profile directory. If |
4 |
> > * we introduce a new file via PMS that was not in there before, |
5 |
> > * and another package manager accesses that file but expects |
6 |
> > different information there not corresponding to our new definition, |
7 |
> > that package manager should be considered broken because it is not |
8 |
> > adhering to previous PMS revisions. So? |
9 |
> |
10 |
> What happens if a user uses an EAPI 4 ebuild with an EAPI 4 package |
11 |
> manager when the ebuild in question would be hit by your new files, |
12 |
> which the package manager doesn't know about yet? |
13 |
|
14 |
Err, nothing? The useflags remain available and switchable as before, no |
15 |
difference regarding useflags between stable / not stable? |
16 |
|
17 |
-- |
18 |
|
19 |
Andreas K. Huettel |
20 |
Gentoo Linux developer |
21 |
dilfridge@g.o |
22 |
http://www.akhuettel.de/ |