Archives
Archives
| From: | "Michał Górny" <mgorny@g.o> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-pms@l.g.o | ||
| Cc: | James Le Cuirot <chewi@g.o> | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-pms] [PATCH] Correct the definition of ESYSROOT as EPREFIX isn't always applicable | ||
| Date: | Sun, 02 Jun 2019 06:10:42 | ||
| Message-Id: | 86e060cfba8bd04fba34365e9805852a1ccce472.camel@gentoo.org | ||
| In Reply to: | [gentoo-pms] [PATCH] Correct the definition of ESYSROOT as EPREFIX isn't always applicable by James Le Cuirot |
||
| 1 | On Sat, 2019-06-01 at 23:29 +0100, James Le Cuirot wrote: |
| 2 | > Unfortunately my conception of ESYSROOT was a little short-sighted. It |
| 3 | > was previously defined as SYSROOT + EPREFIX but if SYSROOT does not |
| 4 | > equal ROOT then EPREFIX does not make sense in this context. Consider |
| 5 | > a more concrete example: |
| 6 | > |
| 7 | |
| 8 | Once again, you are missing the point that e.g. pkg-config files will |
| 9 | have EPREFIX hardcoded. |
| 10 | |
| 11 | -- |
| 12 | Best regards, |
| 13 | Michał Górny |
| File name | MIME type |
|---|---|
| signature.asc | application/pgp-signature |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-pms] [PATCH] Correct the definition of ESYSROOT as EPREFIX isn't always applicable | James Le Cuirot <chewi@g.o> |