Gentoo Archives: gentoo-pms

From: "Petteri Räty" <betelgeuse@g.o>
To: gentoo-pms@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-pms] The order of functions for upgrade/downgrade
Date: Sat, 03 Apr 2010 21:21:57
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-pms] The order of functions for upgrade/downgrade by David Leverton
On 04/04/2010 12:19 AM, David Leverton wrote:
> On Saturday 03 April 2010 22:11:55 Petteri Räty wrote: >> What is the order that other PMs currently use? > > Paludis uses the "old" order for EAPIs 0 and 1, and the "new" order for 2 and > 3 (going by the EAPI of the newly-installed package). I thought the plan was > for PMS to specify the new order for 2 and later (and in practice, probably > make it undefined for 0 and 1) so it's probably an oversight that it doesn't. >
Yeah this seems prudent to me and was actually what we were just talking about on #gentoo-dev. Regards, Petteri


File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature