Re: [gentoo-pms] The order of functions for upgrade/downgrade

[Petteri Räty]

On 04/04/2010 12:19 AM, David Leverton wrote:
> On Saturday 03 April 2010 22:11:55 Petteri Räty wrote:
>> What is the order that other PMs currently use?
>
> Paludis uses the "old" order for EAPIs 0 and 1, and the "new" order for 2 and
> 3 (going by the EAPI of the newly-installed package).  I thought the plan was
> for PMS to specify the new order for 2 and later (and in practice, probably
> make it undefined for 0 and 1) so it's probably an oversight that it doesn't.
>

Yeah this seems prudent to me and was actually what we were just talking
about on #gentoo-dev.

Regards,
Petteri