Gentoo Archives: gentoo-pms

From: Ulrich Mueller <ulm@g.o>
To: gentoo-pms@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-pms] Clarification on the read-only status of HOME variable
Date: Wed, 04 May 2016 07:12:58
Message-Id: 22313.41203.733325.323581@a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de
In Reply to: [gentoo-pms] Clarification on the read-only status of HOME variable by "Göktürk Yüksek"
1 >>>>> On Tue, 3 May 2016, Göktürk Yüksek wrote:
2
3 > I would like to know if HOME variable is read-only or not. According
4 > to the Section 11.1 of PMS [0] it should be read-only.
5
6 You have answered your own question. :)
7
8 > However, it's not documented in devmanual and repoman does not have
9 > any checks for it [1]. Can I get a final confirmation before I start
10 > patching things?
11
12 In fact, HOME is mentioned once in the devmanual [2]. However, it
13 seems that that paragraph gives completely wrong advice and should be
14 removed altogether.
15
16 Ulrich
17
18 > [0] https://dev.gentoo.org/~ulm/pms/head/pms.html#x1-11900011.1
19 > [1] https://github.com/gentoo/portage/blob/master/pym/repoman/modules/scan/ebuild/checks.py#L239
20 [2] https://devmanual.gentoo.org/appendices/common-problems/index.html#handling-access-violations