From: | David Leverton <levertond@××××××××××.com> | ||
---|---|---|---|
To: | gentoo-pms@l.g.o | ||
Subject: | Re: [gentoo-pms] The order of functions for upgrade/downgrade | ||
Date: | Sat, 03 Apr 2010 21:19:59 | ||
Message-Id: | 201004032219.50735.levertond@googlemail.com | ||
In Reply to: | [gentoo-pms] The order of functions for upgrade/downgrade by "Petteri Räty" |
1 | On Saturday 03 April 2010 22:11:55 Petteri Räty wrote: |
2 | > What is the order that other PMs currently use? |
3 | |
4 | Paludis uses the "old" order for EAPIs 0 and 1, and the "new" order for 2 and |
5 | 3 (going by the EAPI of the newly-installed package). I thought the plan was |
6 | for PMS to specify the new order for 2 and later (and in practice, probably |
7 | make it undefined for 0 and 1) so it's probably an oversight that it doesn't. |
Subject | Author |
---|---|
Re: [gentoo-pms] The order of functions for upgrade/downgrade | "Petteri Räty" <betelgeuse@g.o> |