Gentoo Archives: gentoo-pms

From: Ulrich Mueller <ulm@g.o>
To: Christian Faulhammer <fauli@g.o>
Cc: gentoo-pms@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-pms] \t redefinition
Date: Tue, 21 Dec 2010 19:33:56
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-pms] \t redefinition by Christian Faulhammer
>>>>> On Tue, 21 Dec 2010, Christian Faulhammer wrote:
>> I'd rather postpone such changes, until the features that didn't >> make it for EAPI 4 will have been merged again.
> That was the intention, they build on top of all the other patches.
By "features that didn't make make it" I meant things like the following commits: <;a=commit;h=409fccc10861c361f37a959195d7581a5c376dd9> <;a=commit;h=9d2b8ee57bf3be941cfdfe13650952d91b9edfdc> Basically, these commits should be reverted when the next EAPI is introduced. Which will no longer be easily possible after such extensive format changes. Ulrich


Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-pms] \t redefinition Christian Faulhammer <fauli@g.o>