Gentoo Archives: gentoo-pms

From: "Robin H. Johnson" <robbat2@g.o>
To: gentoo-pms@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-pms] EAPI specification in ebuilds
Date: Fri, 06 Apr 2012 17:29:28
In Reply to: [gentoo-pms] EAPI specification in ebuilds by Ulrich Mueller
On Fri, Apr 06, 2012 at 09:40:16AM +0200, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
> +To enable parsing of ebuilds for the \t{EAPI} value, the \t{EAPI} assignment statement must adhere > +to the following syntax: It must consist of the string \t{EAPI}, followed by an equals sign, > +followed by the \t{EAPI} value, optionally enclosed in single or double quotes. The statement must > +be on its own line, optionally preceded or followed by whitespace (spaces or tabs), optionally > +followed by a comment. Thus, the line must match the following regular expression: > +\begin{verbatim} > +^[ \t]*EAPI=(['"]?)([A-Za-z0-9+_.-]*)\1[ \t]*(#.*)?$
EAPI= is valid in this. Was that intended? Will there be any issue overriding EAPI as an env var to call a function/command? EAPI=... foo -- Robin Hugh Johnson Gentoo Linux: Developer, Trustee & Infrastructure Lead E-Mail : robbat2@g.o GnuPG FP : 11ACBA4F 4778E3F6 E4EDF38E B27B944E 34884E85


Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-pms] EAPI specification in ebuilds Brian Harring <ferringb@×××××.com>
Re: [gentoo-pms] EAPI specification in ebuilds Ciaran McCreesh <ciaran.mccreesh@××××××××××.com>
Re: [gentoo-pms] EAPI specification in ebuilds Ulrich Mueller <ulm@g.o>