Archives
Archives
| From: | Ulrich Mueller <ulm@g.o> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-pms@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-pms] EAPI specification in ebuilds | ||
| Date: | Tue, 10 Apr 2012 22:11:47 | ||
| Message-Id: | 20356.45069.304214.122906@a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-pms] EAPI specification in ebuilds by Ciaran McCreesh |
||
| 1 | >>>>> On Tue, 10 Apr 2012, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: |
| 2 | |
| 3 | >> And if possible, it should be specified in a way that doesn't |
| 4 | >> invalidate ebuilds with harmless permutations like this: |
| 5 | >> |
| 6 | >> WANT_AUTOCONF="2.1" |
| 7 | >> EAPI="3" |
| 8 | |
| 9 | > That would make it an utter pain in the ass to specify and verify... |
| 10 | > How much does this right now? |
| 11 | |
| 12 | If my script is working correctly, 130 ebuilds in the Portage tree |
| 13 | (which is less than I had expected). I haven't checked any overlays. |
| 14 | |
| 15 | Ulrich |