Archives
Archives
| From: | Ulrich Mueller <ulm@g.o> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-pms@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-pms] Extend slot-operator-deps with sub-slot support | ||
| Date: | Fri, 17 Aug 2012 06:48:09 | ||
| Message-Id: | 20525.59660.197082.215568@a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-pms] Extend slot-operator-deps with sub-slot support by Zac Medico |
||
| 1 | >>>>> On Thu, 16 Aug 2012, Zac Medico wrote: |
| 2 | |
| 3 | >>> The attached patch extends the slot-operator-deps specification to |
| 4 | >>> include sub-slot support (as it's implemented in Portage with EAPI |
| 5 | >>> 4-slot-abi). Some links for reference: |
| 6 | >>> |
| 7 | >>> http://blogs.gentoo.org/zmedico/2012/06/23/automatic-rebuilds-with-experimental-eapi-4-slot-abi/ |
| 8 | >>> http://dev.gentoo.org/~zmedico/portage/doc/portage.html#package-ebuild-eapi-4-slot-abi |
| 9 | >>> https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=424429 |
| 10 | >> |
| 11 | >> Can we not use the term "reverse dependencies" please? It's horribly |
| 12 | >> ambiguous. |
| 13 | |
| 14 | > Yes, I've changed it to say "dependent packages" instead. I've also |
| 15 | > removed the redundant sub-slot-names section, as suggested by Ulrich |
| 16 | > on irc. |
| 17 | |
| 18 | Committed to eapi-5 branch, with two changes: |
| 19 | - I've added another column "Supports sub-slots?" to tab:slot-deps-table. |
| 20 | - The "sub-slot" label was defined twice (and LaTeX complained about |
| 21 | it, so I've removed one of the definitions. |
| 22 | |
| 23 | <http://git.overlays.gentoo.org/gitweb/?p=proj/pms.git;a=commit;h=5d6749ac9e5ddc5b1daaad7737b65fa81c6ece47> |
| 24 | |
| 25 | Ulrich |