Archives
Archives
| From: | Ulrich Mueller <ulm@g.o> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-pms@l.g.o | ||
| Cc: | Brian Harring <ferringb@×××××.com> | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-pms] [PATCH] EAPI must be at least a single char. | ||
| Date: | Sun, 30 Sep 2012 09:13:44 | ||
| Message-Id: | 20584.3387.660954.8184@a1i15.kph.uni-mainz.de | ||
| In Reply to: | [gentoo-pms] [PATCH] EAPI must be at least a single char. by Brian Harring |
||
| 1 | >>>>> On Sun, 30 Sep 2012, Brian Harring wrote: |
| 2 | |
| 3 | > The example regex allowed for |
| 4 | > EAPI= |
| 5 | |
| 6 | > Which isn't used, alloewd, nor desired; at best, that's short hand |
| 7 | > for EAPI=0. |
| 8 | |
| 9 | The regexp was never meant to match exactly what is allowed. |
| 10 | It matches a superset, and if the matched substring turns out to be an |
| 11 | illegal or unknown EAPI, then the PM can catch it after parsing. |
| 12 | |
| 13 | Otherwise, an empty EAPI is already forbidden by section 3.1 |
| 14 | "Restrictions upon Names". |
| 15 | |
| 16 | Ulrich |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-pms] [PATCH] EAPI must be at least a single char. | Brian Harring <ferringb@×××××.com> |