Gentoo Archives: gentoo-portage-dev

From: Chris White <chriswhite@g.o>
To: gentoo-portage-dev@l.g.o
Subject: [gentoo-portage-dev] [RFC] xpak.py structure changes
Date: Sun, 23 Jul 2006 05:32:42
Message-Id: 20060722193041.5c9f7cf7@localhost
1 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
2 Hash: SHA1
3
4 Hi all,
5
6 Attached to this email is a document that describes proposed changes,
7 why I propose the changes, and what other areas of portage need to be
8 changed so they changes don't break other things. Right now I'm poking
9 the waters to see how much of the proposal, if any, that the developers
10 will go for. This will prevent me from writing lots of code, only to
11 find out that "such and such won't work" ;). Comments welcome.
12
13 Chris White
14 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
15 Version: GnuPG v1.4.2.2 (GNU/Linux)
16
17 iD8DBQFEwf5ZFdQwWVoAgN4RAlSgAKDzHrwVpcHbXMIupZSZJXwWhwVGywCdFdUs
18 UOBv9Ow1A743h9duVzx73uQ=
19 =MXz7
20 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Attachments

File name MIME type
XpakRecommendations.txt text/plain

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] [RFC] xpak.py structure changes Brian Harring <ferringb@×××××.com>