1 |
On Thu, Mar 02, 2006 at 10:44:58PM +0200, Marius Mauch wrote: |
2 |
> Brian Harring wrote: |
3 |
> >On 2/28/06, *Michael Schilling* <gentoo@×××××××.de |
4 |
> ><mailto:gentoo@×××××××.de>> wrote: |
5 |
> > |
6 |
> > - Is one of these svn-web-repository up to date? |
7 |
> > * http://sources.gentoo.org/viewcvs.py/portage/main/branches/savior/ |
8 |
> > * http://mzz.mine.nu/bzr/savior-svn/portage/ |
9 |
> > <http://mzz.mine.nu/bzr/savior-svn/portage/> |
10 |
> > |
11 |
> > |
12 |
> >I switched over to bzr about 2 months back; svn doesn't allow for |
13 |
> >offline committing, nor does gentoo's vcs allow for anon*... bzr |
14 |
> >natively allows for those capabilities, so that's what I'm using. :) |
15 |
> > |
16 |
> >http://gentooexperimental.org/~ferringb/bzr/saviour |
17 |
> >Is where I'll be updating the code for at least the near future. |
18 |
> > |
19 |
> |
20 |
> Does that mean we should drop the SVN branch? |
21 |
|
22 |
Realistically... I have no intention of going back to SVN, haven't for |
23 |
a while. Can't even access the darn thing now a days anyways, thus |
24 |
the branch has fallen further in usefulness to me :) |
25 |
|
26 |
If y'all want to mirror it, might I suggest poking marienz for his |
27 |
tailorization knowledge? Afaik, he had a bzr->svn push working, or at |
28 |
least has investigated it. |
29 |
|
30 |
~harring |