| 1 |
On Sun, 2010-02-14 at 12:11 -0800, Zac Medico wrote: |
| 2 |
> On 02/14/2010 04:36 AM, Brian Harring wrote: |
| 3 |
> > This gets nasty... you're basically talking about the rpm equivalent |
| 4 |
> > of EPOCH. |
| 5 |
> > |
| 6 |
> > Not a fan of an adhoc UUID (especially since it'll become standard |
| 7 |
> > via portage doing it), but a *timestamp* for the build, labeled as |
| 8 |
> > such, gets you what you want and is usable for other things- detecting |
| 9 |
> > when to rebuild a scm package for example. |
| 10 |
> > |
| 11 |
> > That route gets my vote, and should also address your intentions. |
| 12 |
> > ~harring |
| 13 |
> |
| 14 |
> Ok, then how about a vdb entry named CTIME that contains an integer |
| 15 |
> number of seconds since the unix Epoch? |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
That would be UNIXTIME vs CTIME I'd think. |
Archives