1 |
On Sat, 2004-10-09 at 06:53, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: |
2 |
> On Fri, 8 Oct 2004 20:05:16 -0500 (EST) Ed Grimm |
3 |
> <paranoid@××××××××××××××××××××××.org> wrote: |
4 |
> | On Fri, 8 Oct 2004, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: |
5 |
> | > As I recall, 127 is flaky. Come to think of it, so is 0-31ish as |
6 |
> | > well. So maybe I should've said |
7 |
> | > [a-zA-Z0-9\-_,.<>?/\\;:'@#~\]{}\+="$%^&* ] or something... |
8 |
> | > Basically, anything even the slightest bit flaky, plus newlines, is |
9 |
> | > prone to explode. |
10 |
> | |
11 |
> | I hope you like long lines. |
12 |
> |
13 |
> Well, remember that there's no standard way of doing newlines. Or that |
14 |
> there're at least three standards, depending upon how you look at it. |
15 |
> |
16 |
> Eh, not that this is really relevant anyway. All that matters is that |
17 |
> ASCII is insufficient and that UTF-8 is most likely the best |
18 |
> alternative. |
19 |
|
20 |
Thank you. |
21 |
|
22 |
I have changed porthole's code to try decode(utf_8), then try |
23 |
decode(iso-8859-1). Failing either of those Porthole will display an |
24 |
unknown encoding error and to please report it to bugs.gentoo.org as |
25 |
well as porthole's bug tracker. |
26 |
|
27 |
|
28 |
-- |
29 |
Brian <dol-sen@×××××.net> |
30 |
|
31 |
|
32 |
-- |
33 |
gentoo-portage-dev@g.o mailing list |