1 |
>>>>> "ZM" == Zac Medico <zmedico@g.o> writes: |
2 |
|
3 |
ZM> That commit allows backtracking to continue in the event that unsolved |
4 |
ZM> blockers are encountered, solving this bug: |
5 |
|
6 |
ZM> https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=465638 |
7 |
|
8 |
I read the bug. But it was the only commit that at first glance *could* |
9 |
have been the issue. |
10 |
|
11 |
ZM> That means that emerge may spend some more time backtracking in some |
12 |
ZM> cases involving blockers, even though the backtracking may not |
13 |
ZM> ultimately lead to a useful solution. |
14 |
|
15 |
Five hours more, in my case. |
16 |
|
17 |
ZM> Did your test case involve blockers? Are you using the --backtrack |
18 |
ZM> option to increase the amount of backtracking that is allowed? |
19 |
|
20 |
Yes. There are several blockers and at some point in the fuzzy past I |
21 |
added --backtrack=30 to get around some issue which was preventing the |
22 |
automated sync && pv from reporting any possible updates. |
23 |
|
24 |
The larger backtrace allowed pv to complete. Then the scripts use -O |
25 |
to merge a few packages at a time in the pv order. |
26 |
|
27 |
As a side note, my next workstation will split most stuff into smaller |
28 |
topic-spcific VMs so as to avoid the annoying conflicts which occur when |
29 |
one tries to keep everything one might need available at once. |
30 |
|
31 |
-JimC |
32 |
-- |
33 |
James Cloos <cloos@×××××××.com> OpenPGP: 1024D/ED7DAEA6 |