Gentoo Archives: gentoo-portage-dev

From: Francesco Riosa <BastianBalthazarBux@×××××××××.it>
To: gentoo-portage-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] Order of operations: buildpkg
Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2006 14:07:54
Message-Id: 43D63475.6070304@pnpitalia.it
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] Order of operations: buildpkg by Paul de Vrieze
1 Paul de Vrieze wrote:
2 > On Tuesday 24 January 2006 14:19, Mike Frysinger wrote:
3 >
4 >> On Tuesday 24 January 2006 03:43, Francesco Riosa wrote:
5 >>
6 >>> Indeed, could someone shade a light on what happen to /var/db/pkg and
7 >>> world file when using "ebuild" this manner ?
8 >>> Could be rephrased as "Does it act exactly the same way emerge does ?"
9 >>>
10 >> the 'qmerge' step would take care of updating /var/db/pkg
11 >> -mike
12 >>
13 >
14 > And yes it should, except that this does not clean out
15 > the /var/tmp/portage/pkgname-version directory. Use the clean command for
16 > that. If you find out the results are not the same it's a bug. (Of course
17 > package creates a package, which emerge might or might not do based on your
18 > config). The package step can also be skipped.
19 >
20 > Paul
21 >
22 >
23 That's fine, these functions are intended for developer use that may
24 need to still have the work/image dir in place.
25
26 thanks everyone to address my worries .
27
28
29 Francesco
30 --
31 gentoo-portage-dev@g.o mailing list