| 1 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- |
| 2 |
Hash: SHA512 |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
On 08/04/16 08:21, Zac Medico wrote: |
| 5 |
> Reverse? You want it to measure dissimilarity? Not sure what you |
| 6 |
> mean. |
| 7 |
Sorry, I meant reverse the *docs* to mean "find things that are at |
| 8 |
least 50% similar" rather than "cut off things that aren't above the |
| 9 |
0.5 threshold". I.e. use an inclusive sentence. I feel that this is |
| 10 |
more clear. |
| 11 |
|
| 12 |
> I just want it to fail if the input is invalid. |
| 13 |
Yes, I just realised you checked if it were <=, not just <. I think |
| 14 |
this is a bad idea. It's easily missed -- I just missed it last time |
| 15 |
around. I would suggest to make it fail early, rather than set it to |
| 16 |
0.0 which you then set to None. Just set it to None immediately. |
| 17 |
- -- |
| 18 |
Alexander |
| 19 |
bernalex@g.o |
| 20 |
https://secure.plaimi.net/~alexander |
| 21 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- |
| 22 |
Version: GnuPG v2 |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJXB5bsAAoJENQqWdRUGk8BSO8QAKXJlxYpetrA8kKbvW/cknoO |
| 25 |
wrLPkHsmn7imnfQddcXVHtE+K1GJCRcG1Eu2VD+Pqza3HLRPl20eTm8+iu+maftk |
| 26 |
K41+SCNEb8qs9v05P2wcqPxtUlzI4OO9GwJFJkbycRxgCFtCYnM/0B2kXaSKOkHr |
| 27 |
KY4cF9CbdzfwIYL2FkmaCJrCBI9ac1sjsnug9yN+wXIYVV6nzpPLPq8QJU9P6sef |
| 28 |
XI7na2mMHpK75FHl5fW/yVJfCXuBHmGgryfyEm+uUtvpLWpGceRBbRl4naJljbsf |
| 29 |
AVNSocBmPdWGL6PCdfcD5MID8iriIBfTYWLsAoBN1HcKKasSKr1BG+UxT3wGov7n |
| 30 |
STbQ7MLVQpDluS3kCgjbVNWUlouOcVhcNdOniC3GEDxzpT9ev7Tk/FilMNNu167N |
| 31 |
l28SaGUokLQnf/EuQfQmNJJyHpFIVsxeRs5ODQZDlvb10WHDFMtYCkXZDhrLJmm6 |
| 32 |
Ej+tFJiuMWfAIejzVkJ0gvZTvg5FzVknvEey9iNokzXnOsngIjaR4gS8KjUUH0k8 |
| 33 |
EF1348cJ3KwQxbkWifsEuVosDmiSFaF38j73IoYaHOQh06bVPm2gL/zGeGntDGQY |
| 34 |
X+RXL5XTJefiKps1jG4e96jYEUWIIlA/fodxkERKXcEmOsvT29v5gEAwcq6YGWXG |
| 35 |
McLGDbOpF/n9tuxihQQK |
| 36 |
=GgNP |
| 37 |
-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
Archives