1 |
On Tuesday 30 November 2004 23:22, Brian Harring wrote: |
2 |
> On Sun, 2004-11-28 at 09:08, Gustavo Barbieri wrote: |
3 |
> > On Sat, 27 Nov 2004 17:48:54 -0600, Michael Tindal <urilith@g.o> |
4 |
> > wrote: |
5 |
> > > Jstubbs is working on an api that will make its way into a later |
6 |
> > > revision of portage. As far as parsing |
7 |
> > > ebuilds, they are sourced directly from bash. |
8 |
> > |
9 |
> > There is any explanation/roadmap/design I can look at? Jstubbs reads |
10 |
> > this list? What's his goals, how he want to achieve it? |
11 |
|
12 |
I read your first message, thought to myself "does this deserve an answer?" |
13 |
and then ignored the entire thread, apart from Michael's and Brian's posts. |
14 |
|
15 |
> He'd have to state his goals- |
16 |
|
17 |
Strict clear dependency resolution. It's already slower in CVS and, at least |
18 |
theoretically, can only become slower. On the other hand, it should save |
19 |
hours and hours in compile failures. |
20 |
|
21 |
Regards, |
22 |
Jason Stubbs |
23 |
|
24 |
-- |
25 |
gentoo-portage-dev@g.o mailing list |