| 1 |
> Since you're sliding this in, why not slide it in using use dep |
| 2 |
> syntax? |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
> No, not going to fight over this not being in package.mask, what I'm |
| 5 |
> saying is this _is_ masking of a use dep atom, just use use dep syntax |
| 6 |
> in the file instead. |
| 7 |
> |
| 8 |
> If y'all get use deps, it'll be a bit simpler for folks to support |
| 9 |
> then the existing crappy format used imo. |
| 10 |
> |
| 11 |
> Plus, parsing it's easy. |
| 12 |
> ~harring |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
Because as you've noted a thousand times, use deps are hard, and this is |
| 15 |
easy and inevasive. |
| 16 |
-- |
| 17 |
gentoo-portage-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives