1 |
On 14-05-2008 00:45:10 +0200, Marius Mauch wrote: |
2 |
> On Mon, 12 May 2008 20:53:35 +0200 |
3 |
> Fabian Groffen <grobian@g.o> wrote: |
4 |
> |
5 |
> > The following patch shows the url to the binhost in an emerge -av as |
6 |
> > repository name, instead of "unknown". Unfortunately the patch |
7 |
> > doesn't store the binhost url, such that portage can't show where the |
8 |
> > package comes from when unmerged. |
9 |
> |
10 |
> Not sure if this is the right thing to do, or if the reponame in those |
11 |
> cases should be the one from the source repo that was used to generate |
12 |
> those binary packages. Not saying that the binhost name here is |
13 |
> useless, quite the opposite, just a bit concerned about mixing |
14 |
> different things here. |
15 |
|
16 |
The idea behind it is that the repo_name of the binhost is not |
17 |
necessarily useful. In many cases it will contain the default repo_name |
18 |
value, since people just create binpkgs with a standard Portage install. |
19 |
|
20 |
I agree it is a hack. Perhaps a combination of the repo_name and its |
21 |
url would be the best. |
22 |
|
23 |
|
24 |
-- |
25 |
Fabian Groffen |
26 |
Gentoo on a different level |
27 |
-- |
28 |
gentoo-portage-dev@l.g.o mailing list |