| 1 |
On Tuesday 14 January 2014 00:37:21 Brian Dolbec wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Mon, 2014-01-13 at 23:59 -0500, Mike Frysinger wrote: |
| 3 |
> > On Monday 13 January 2014 22:23:01 Tom Wijsman wrote: |
| 4 |
> > > On Mon, 13 Jan 2014 19:50:44 -0500 Mike Frysinger wrote: |
| 5 |
> > > > On Monday 13 January 2014 19:08:30 creffett@g.o wrote: |
| 6 |
> > > > > From: Chris Reffett <creffett@g.o> |
| 7 |
> > > > > Subject: [gentoo-portage-dev] [PATCH] Add repoman check to warn if |
| 8 |
> > > > > src_prepare/src_configure are used in EAPI 0/1 |
| 9 |
> > > |
| 10 |
> > > Well, I was planning to cover these bugs; seems we really need to |
| 11 |
> > > organize with regards to avoiding double work, as two others have got |
| 12 |
> > > the same happen to them. Let's synchronize it. |
| 13 |
> > |
| 14 |
> > we have a bugzilla workflow doc posted which we'll merge once git is back |
| 15 |
> > up. please do not reassign portage bugs to yourself. instead, set the |
| 16 |
> > status to INPROGRESS. |
| 17 |
> |
| 18 |
> Sorry, that was me that told him to. I didn't know about a bugzilla |
| 19 |
> workflow doc. Plus I didn't see it at www.gentoo.org. So it wasn't |
| 20 |
> converted to the wiki. |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
[gentoo-portage-dev] [PATCH] Document bugzilla workflow |
| 23 |
From: SebastianLuther@×××.de |
| 24 |
To: gentoo-portage-dev@l.g.o |
| 25 |
Date: 08.01.2014 13:25 |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
off the top of my head, the only team that does this sort of flow is the docs |
| 28 |
team, and i've never particularly cared for it. i'd prefer we stick with |
| 29 |
using the INPROGRESS flag as our "lock" to avoid stomping on each other's feet |
| 30 |
as it's already part of the flow. if that doesn't work out, we can talk about |
| 31 |
alternatives. |
| 32 |
-mike |
Archives