1 |
On 12/17/2014 03:57 PM, Zac Medico wrote: |
2 |
> On 12/17/2014 02:32 PM, Brian Dolbec wrote: |
3 |
>> On Wed, 17 Dec 2014 12:30:53 -0800 |
4 |
> |
5 |
>> But what about the different sync types. How do we handle this in a |
6 |
>> git repo instead of an rsync one? |
7 |
> |
8 |
> I was thinking that we would only need to implement this for the rsync |
9 |
> repo, since that's the only one that includes the glsas. If there's some |
10 |
> reason to implement it for other sync types in the future, then we can |
11 |
> do it when the need arises. |
12 |
|
13 |
Also, at some point we might introduce a notion of submodules, similar |
14 |
to git submodules, and if necessary each submodule could potentially be |
15 |
synced using a different protocol. However, this is way beyond the |
16 |
present needs. For now, simply extending the rsync module to allow |
17 |
syncing of sub-directories should be sufficient (though I would not |
18 |
expose the ability to sync arbitrary directories through the user |
19 |
interface). |
20 |
-- |
21 |
Thanks, |
22 |
Zac |