1 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
|
2 |
Hash: SHA512
|
3 |
|
4 |
On Fri, 04 Apr 2014 22:01:39 +0200
|
5 |
Alexander Berntsen <bernalex@g.o> wrote:
|
6 |
|
7 |
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- |
8 |
> Hash: SHA256 |
9 |
> |
10 |
> On 04/04/14 21:36, Brian Dolbec wrote: |
11 |
> > Is there any other bugfixes to go in? I am merging some other |
12 |
> > patches submitted to the list as well. |
13 |
> There's my/your/our patch(es) for bug 505944. Any idea on what to do |
14 |
> about that? No one has offered a better way yet. |
15 |
> |
16 |
> - -- |
17 |
> Alexander |
18 |
> |
19 |
|
20 |
Yeah, I was thinking the same thing. let's do the:
|
21 |
|
22 |
if dep.atom and dep.atom.unevaluated_atom and
|
23 |
dep.atom is not dep.atom.unevaluated_atom:
|
24 |
|
25 |
|
26 |
- --
|
27 |
Brian Dolbec <dolsen>
|
28 |
|
29 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
|
30 |
Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux)
|
31 |
|
32 |
iQF8BAEBCgBmBQJTPyREXxSAAAAAAC4AKGlzc3Vlci1mcHJAbm90YXRpb25zLm9w
|
33 |
ZW5wZ3AuZmlmdGhob3JzZW1hbi5uZXQ4Njg4RkQxQ0M3MUMxQzA0RUFFQTQyMzcy
|
34 |
MjE0RDkwQTAxNEYxN0NCAAoJECIU2QoBTxfLT38H/jszGW1hMLxVFtujWFVwLjAt
|
35 |
StcFqGn1JyWkfdABATtrgsgxFApdzfQAghHStpWbKZwjdT0pcMcfc07l7S/cXzuh
|
36 |
eACMb6hjlkcuwywgF8Yf1iug28T7XKJCLlgJ3KCyHDyPYNhieBykEAPyjAVHdjQe
|
37 |
SSgJOudHskmFGRoIrkfMEeB3I+q+p3vf20qVIrthjZ3ooq4iNu2Hply3whOPF2S/
|
38 |
2O3cFc0ykxL/OHJWhuyksRUzCcwr1ZmaEhBcli7IU/lmSQAq1994FNCrn130myC4
|
39 |
ZH+nqqMb2NRvs1lIxlEMGnDWVDb+H8PZuIZcGgYcvPY8TJtibf7V3H0q2DWTTcs=
|
40 |
=k5tB
|
41 |
-----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |