Gentoo Archives: gentoo-portage-dev

From: Brian Dolbec <dolsen@g.o>
To: gentoo-portage-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] Two bugfix patches
Date: Fri, 04 Apr 2014 21:30:10
Message-Id: 20140404142939.15d16e1c.dolsen@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] Two bugfix patches by Alexander Berntsen
1 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
2 Hash: SHA512
3
4 On Fri, 04 Apr 2014 22:01:39 +0200
5 Alexander Berntsen <bernalex@g.o> wrote:
6
7 > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
8 > Hash: SHA256
9 >
10 > On 04/04/14 21:36, Brian Dolbec wrote:
11 > > Is there any other bugfixes to go in? I am merging some other
12 > > patches submitted to the list as well.
13 > There's my/your/our patch(es) for bug 505944. Any idea on what to do
14 > about that? No one has offered a better way yet.
15 >
16 > - --
17 > Alexander
18 >
19
20 Yeah, I was thinking the same thing. let's do the:
21
22 if dep.atom and dep.atom.unevaluated_atom and
23 dep.atom is not dep.atom.unevaluated_atom:
24
25
26 - --
27 Brian Dolbec <dolsen>
28
29 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
30 Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux)
31
32 iQF8BAEBCgBmBQJTPyREXxSAAAAAAC4AKGlzc3Vlci1mcHJAbm90YXRpb25zLm9w
33 ZW5wZ3AuZmlmdGhob3JzZW1hbi5uZXQ4Njg4RkQxQ0M3MUMxQzA0RUFFQTQyMzcy
34 MjE0RDkwQTAxNEYxN0NCAAoJECIU2QoBTxfLT38H/jszGW1hMLxVFtujWFVwLjAt
35 StcFqGn1JyWkfdABATtrgsgxFApdzfQAghHStpWbKZwjdT0pcMcfc07l7S/cXzuh
36 eACMb6hjlkcuwywgF8Yf1iug28T7XKJCLlgJ3KCyHDyPYNhieBykEAPyjAVHdjQe
37 SSgJOudHskmFGRoIrkfMEeB3I+q+p3vf20qVIrthjZ3ooq4iNu2Hply3whOPF2S/
38 2O3cFc0ykxL/OHJWhuyksRUzCcwr1ZmaEhBcli7IU/lmSQAq1994FNCrn130myC4
39 ZH+nqqMb2NRvs1lIxlEMGnDWVDb+H8PZuIZcGgYcvPY8TJtibf7V3H0q2DWTTcs=
40 =k5tB
41 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----