Gentoo Archives: gentoo-portage-dev

From: "Michał Górny" <mgorny@g.o>
To: gentoo-portage-dev@l.g.o
Cc: Zac Medico <zmedico@g.o>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] [PATCH 1/2] portdbapi: add async_aux_get method (bug 648790)
Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2018 12:29:21
Message-Id: 1519648153.1702.2.camel@gentoo.org
In Reply to: [gentoo-portage-dev] [PATCH 1/2] portdbapi: add async_aux_get method (bug 648790) by Zac Medico
1 W dniu nie, 25.02.2018 o godzinie 17∶50 -0800, użytkownik Zac Medico
2 napisał:
3 > Add async_aux_get method that returns a Future and otherwise
4 > behaves identically to aux_get. Use async_aux_get to implement
5 > the synchronous aux_get method.
6 >
7 > Bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/648790
8 > ---
9 > pym/portage/dbapi/porttree.py | 91 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------
10 > 1 file changed, 70 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
11 >
12
13 What's the exact use case? What's the gain, in numbers? This seems like
14 a lot of added complexity. With Portage being practically
15 unmaintainable, I'm against any changes that make things worse without
16 clearly defined major benefit.
17
18 --
19 Best regards,
20 Michał Górny

Replies