Gentoo Archives: gentoo-portage-dev

From: "Michał Górny" <mgorny@g.o>
To: gentoo-portage-dev@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [RFC] gpkg format proposal v2 (was: Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] [RFC] Improving Gentoo package format)
Date: Mon, 12 Nov 2018 15:40:58
Message-Id: 1542037251.1527.2.camel@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [RFC] gpkg format proposal v2 (was: Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] [RFC] Improving Gentoo package format) by Francesco Riosa
1 On Mon, 2018-11-12 at 01:21 +0100, Francesco Riosa wrote:
2 > Il giorno dom 11 nov 2018 alle ore 22:17 Michał Górny <mgorny@g.o>
3 > ha scritto:
4 >
5 > > On Sun, 2018-11-11 at 21:53 +0100, Michał Górny wrote:
6 > > [...-]
7 > > Of course, one option would be to use ZIP ;-).
8
9 I wasn't serious there.
10
11 > Zip archives have another big advantage; there is an index of files, so
12 > listing the archive contents and extracting a single file is very fast and
13 > does not depend from it's position in the archive.
14 > The big disadvantage is that only "desktop" profile has unzip by default
15 >
16
17 The two main problems with ZIP is that:
18
19 1. As you noted, it's not present in core system packages.
20
21 2. It uses trailer format which means that you need to fetch the whole
22 file before being able to process it.
23
24 There was also some patent hassle back in the day but I think it's no
25 longer applicable today.
26
27 --
28 Best regards,
29 Michał Górny

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature

Replies

Subject Author
[gentoo-portage-dev] Re: [RFC] gpkg format proposal v2 Francesco Riosa <vivo75@×××××.com>