| 1 |
On Monday 28 November 2005 00:20, Ned Ludd wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Mon, 2005-11-28 at 00:15 +0900, Jason Stubbs wrote: |
| 3 |
> > On Monday 28 November 2005 00:01, Ned Ludd wrote: |
| 4 |
> > > The following untested attached patch removes CDEPEND from ebuild.sh |
| 5 |
> > > A quick grep -i shows that there is one case of CDEPEND left in |
| 6 |
> > > pym/portage.py after applying the patch. It's in the auxdbkeys around |
| 7 |
> > > line 5130. Not sure if that is safe to remove or not. |
| 8 |
> > > The cache entry for CDEP has been replaced with a blank line to keep |
| 9 |
> > > the cache format compatible. |
| 10 |
> > |
| 11 |
> > The CDEPEND in auxdbkeys is needed, but it won't cause any harm other |
| 12 |
> > than the extra 10 or 11 bytes added to portage.py. This patch is pretty |
| 13 |
> > much perfect as it is. :) |
| 14 |
> |
| 15 |
> Great. |
| 16 |
> So it's all in your hands now then I can assume and I don't need to file |
| 17 |
> a bug? ;-) |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
Committed. |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
> Anything else pending before .53 hits stable? |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
I don't believe so. I'll give it until Wednesday 12:00 UTC and put it out then |
| 24 |
if nothing comes up. I don't expect anything to, but I'm having a couple of |
| 25 |
whiskeys atm before bed and will be heading out to a drinking establishment |
| 26 |
tomorrow... ;) |
| 27 |
|
| 28 |
> You know I can be somewhat impatient and I'm ready to get started on |
| 29 |
> making patches for .54 |
| 30 |
|
| 31 |
As are we all. However, the wait seems to be doing good. While trunk is has |
| 32 |
been reopened for a while, the only things that have gone in have been in |
| 33 |
testing outside of trunk for a while which has improved quality greatly. |
| 34 |
|
| 35 |
Given people's expectations of what 2.0.54 should be I'm not sure of what will |
| 36 |
happen with 2.1/2.2. However, given the quality that trunk currently has it |
| 37 |
might be best to split off a branch and lock down the changes in 2.0.54 as |
| 38 |
soon as the first _pre is released. As far as I know, everything I listed in |
| 39 |
my last email to the ".53, .54.." thread have existing tested patches so we |
| 40 |
can probably get a 2.0.54 up to where 2.0.53 is now in half the time... |
| 41 |
|
| 42 |
-- |
| 43 |
Jason Stubbs |
| 44 |
|
| 45 |
-- |
| 46 |
gentoo-portage-dev@g.o mailing list |
Archives