| 1 |
On Sun, Aug 06, 2006 at 11:06:54PM -0700, Zac Medico wrote: |
| 2 |
> Brian Harring wrote: |
| 3 |
> > You're asking on the wrong ml. Profile monkeying really should |
| 4 |
> > include a run through of -dev, *especially* something like that that's |
| 5 |
> > going to be a pita to turn off when folks start abusing it... |
| 6 |
> |
| 7 |
> I'm just running it by the smaller audience first to get some feedback. |
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
Fair enough. |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
> > Prefer default IUSE myself, but the point this should get a run |
| 12 |
> > through on dev stands.... |
| 13 |
> > ~harring |
| 14 |
> |
| 15 |
> Default IUSE would be nice, but maybe people want something at the profile level as well. We'll see... |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
Both I could see, but the original request for this was more along the |
| 18 |
lines of nocxx for gcc- conditionals at the package level enabled by |
| 19 |
default avoiding the no* conditionals instead. |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
Thats not really a profile specific thing- more importantly, it binds |
| 22 |
the packages to the profiles that much tigher, screwing over |
| 23 |
overlays. |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
Profile level without package level kind of crappily addresses the |
| 26 |
original request imo- yes it works, but not all that well imo. |
| 27 |
~harring |
Archives